![]() 01/12/2017 at 22:11 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
But then I saw pics of it in daylight. Good lord, the stretching of proportions is amazing. And they pulled off that front end in a way that Aston Martin simply wasn’t able to do with the Vulcan. I shouldn’t have doubted Mazda.
![]() 01/12/2017 at 22:21 |
|
That’s too bright. Almost white.
![]() 01/12/2017 at 22:22 |
|
The stretching of proportions is “cartoonish”...I think that was the word you were looking for...it’s like the designers were beaten with a stick regularly to chants of “longer.....lower....”
![]() 01/12/2017 at 22:39 |
|
No, not cartoonish. The Toyota C-HR is cartoonish. This is like if the initial drawings came to life. Really rather cool.
![]() 01/12/2017 at 22:40 |
|
?
![]() 01/12/2017 at 22:40 |
|
T’was a commentary on Kinja’s borked-ness.
![]() 01/12/2017 at 22:46 |
|
Hey, in the end, it’s design, people will disagree...I’m not a fan, but I’m probably not the demographic they’re going for.
![]() 01/12/2017 at 23:09 |
|
I agree. Go bold or go home. It’s a cool looking car.
![]() 01/12/2017 at 23:17 |
|
Ahh.
![]() 01/13/2017 at 00:00 |
|
A new white kinja blog?
![]() 01/13/2017 at 08:18 |
|
i’m gunna have to go ahead and disagree with you on that one
The mazda is nice but this is better
![]() 01/13/2017 at 11:35 |
|
Still a bit to concept-y for me. Smaller wheels and everything toned down a bit would help.
![]() 01/13/2017 at 12:25 |
|
The Vulcan is cooler and faster, but the Mazda is styled better. In a light color, the Vulcan looks kinda clumsy, with its super tall rear haunches and seemingly-unfinished front end.